HOME QUOTES SCANDAL$ VIETNAM EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT WOMEN RELIGION GENOCIDE DRUGS MONEY WELFARE FORUM ABOUT

[Randy Cunningham Photo] The Unauthorized Randy “Duke” Cunningham Page

Randy “Duke” Cunningham Forum


  Forum Index
 Why is it?
Author: Paul 
Date:   2006-03-05 10:56:56

Background: As many of you know, I posted an email address for me, so that we could chat off line. Well, I have not opened it for a while and just did. Well, I got a few emails from Cunninghamphiles that did not have the nuts to reply on this thread.

Folks, youse leftists all, tell me why, all Cunningham defenders do or say the same following things:

1. They attack the messenger, never the message.
2. We are 'wannabes' because we discuss Cunningham and spread the info that is in the news from across the nation about his crimes and felonies.
3. We are all envious of Cunningham. Yeah, that is what we are; we are envious and want to get some of that 100-month sentence and public embarrassment. As for envious of his Ace status, damn straight, every Naval Aviator wishes that he had the opportunities and just plain luck that Cunningham had in getting 5 kills. But none of us ever wanted to be the ‘person’ Cunningham. He was then and is now a bore and not too bright. You can see how not too bright he is when you read the plea agreement.
4. Those of us that are, cannot possibly be Naval Aviators, because we are disloyal to him. My god, he got 5-kills, that did not raise him to god status or even CNO status, hell just to show you what the Navy thought of him with 5 kills he barely made it to 0-5 - Commander. However, being called disloyal is not new for me. I was called that when I said, while in the uniform, that the Vietnam war was immoral and it was not worth one American life – especially my arse and I resigned my commission.

Why is it that none of these Cunninghamphiles ever attack the message and say that we got the information all wrong?

If the defenders of ‘Randy the Jail Bird’ do not want to respond here on this thread, my email address is wealthmba@yahoo.com. Bring it . . .

 Re: Why is it?
Author: john 
Date:   2006-03-05 14:28:40

It is because what Cunningham did is indefensible.

It is when extreme zealots, and the stubbornly ignorant try to defend the indefensible; they only make fools out of themselves . . . or worse.

The Fine Print: The above comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way (Communications Decency Act, 47 USC § 230). In compliance with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, we do not accept postings from children under 13 years of age. Privacy notice: messages posted to this forum are public. Trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. The rest copyright © 2001-2012 Dan E. Anderson. All rights reserved.


HOME QUOTES SCANDAL$ VIETNAM EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT WOMEN RELIGION GENOCIDE DRUGS MONEY WELFARE FORUM ABOUT

[Blue Ribbon] [Bottom 5% Web Site] Copyright © 1996-2012 Dan E. Anderson. All rights reserved.
This page is not authorized or approved by anyone, but I hope you enjoy it. About this website.

If you have comments (hate mail, praise, jokes, corrections, constructive criticism, or destructive criticism), please send me (Dan Anderson) a secure private message. You can read other people's comments here.

http://dukecunningham.org/forum/read.php/1301
[Best viewed with 20/20 vision]